Currently Playing...

The Big Tobacco Deal’s 10th Anniversary

Added on 19 November 2008

View More Videos:

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

WARNING: The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement May Be Hazardous

by Ashley Jacobs
01 November 2008 @ 1:52 pm

In his article for the Winter 2008 issue of Cigar Magazine, CEI General Council Sam Kazman discusses the ramifications of the antitobacco movement’s Master Settlement Agreement of a decade ago.

“[It] effectively imposed a massive nationwide cigarette tax increase, even though no elected legislator ever voted for it.”

While acknowledging the health risks of smoking, Mr. Kazman explains how tobacco taxes and regulation have become equally addictive.

Read the full article from Cigar Magazine (PDF).

Read the full story

Posted in: Press ReleasesComments (1)

Appeals Court Rules on Federal Accounting Board

by Christine Hall
22 August 2008 @ 1:37 pm

Dissent Finds Constitutional Violations

Washington, D.C., August 22, 2008— In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today rejected a constitutional challenge to the Sarbanes-Oxley Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The challenge had been brought by the Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead & Watts, a small Nevada accounting firm that was being investigated by the Board.

The plaintiffs claimed that the Board violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, because the Board’s members were selected by the Securities and Exchange Commissioners acting as a body, rather than by the President. They argued that this resulted in a lack of the individual accountability that the Framers viewed as crucial to reining in government.

The majority rejected this argument, ruling…

Read the full story

Posted in: Press ReleasesComments (0)

Lawsuit Against Tobacco Settlement Proceeds

by Christine Hall
06 February 2008 @ 1:32 pm

Federal Court Hears MSA Lawsuit Amid Embarrassments Over Settlement Spending

Washington, D.C., February 6, 2008—A lawsuit challenging the 46-state tobacco “Master Settlement Agreement” (MSA) proceeds today, amid fresh reports of states misspending settlement revenue.

The lawsuit, brought by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, is the subject of a hearing in federal district court on Monday. The lawsuit seeks to overturn the $246 billion tobacco settlement reached by state attorneys general and major tobacco companies in 1998.

“The tobacco settlement was an unconstitutional, corrupt power grab by state attorneys general and trial lawyers,” said Sam Kazman, CEI General Counsel. “The corrupt, backroom tobacco deal imposed a massive, permanent tax on consumers and funded countless wasteful government programs, without helping a single sick smoker,” said…

Read the full story

Posted in: Press ReleasesComments (0)

FDA Tobacco Bill Spells Trouble

by Christine Hall
17 July 2007 @ 1:29 pm

Bill Dubbed ‘Marlboro Monopoly Act’

Washington, D.C., July 17, 2007—The Senate health committee on Wednesday is scheduled to mark up a bill that would put the Food and Drug Administration in charge of regulating tobacco, despite major problems associated with the agency’s current regulatory duties.

“Tobacco does not need FDA regulation, and regulating tobacco is the last thing that FDA needs to being doing,” said Sam Kazman, General Counsel for the Competitive Enterprise Institute. “The agency is already performing poorly in making new drugs available to the public, and a major new regulatory program would only worsen that situation.”

A recent CEI survey of orthopedic surgeons, for example, showed that most of these specialists view the current FDA approval process as already…

Read the full story

Posted in: Press ReleasesComments (0)

Constitutional Challenge to Sarbanes-Oxley Accounting Board Dismissed

by Christine Hall
21 March 2007 @ 3:21 pm

Decision To Be Appealed

Washington, D.C., March 21, 2007— A federal district judge on Wednesday dismissed a constitutional challenge to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) brought by the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the Free Enterprise Fund. The case will be appealed to the circuit court. Read the decision.

The lawsuit, filed on February 7, 2006, alleges that the PCAOB violates the appointments clause (Article II Section 2) of the U.S. Constitution, which grants the power to appoint high level government officials to the President, the courts, or the heads of departments– not a commission such as the Securities and Exchange Commission. The PCAOB was created by Congress as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The board wields great power over…

Read the full story

Posted in: Press ReleasesComments (2)

U.S. District Court to Hear Landmark Sarbanes-Oxley Case

by Christine Hall
20 December 2006 @ 3:18 pm

Financial and Legal Experts Available for Interviews

Washington, D.C., December 20, 2006—Tomorrow the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia will hear arguments in a lawsuit brought by the Free Enterprise Fund and the Competitive Enterprise Institute to have the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board declared unconstitutional. The Board was created under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to regulate the auditing of American businesses.

The Fund and CEI, along with a small accounting firm nearly forced out of business by the Board, are asking the Court to declare it unconstitutional under the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. That clause requires major government officials to be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. However, the five-member accounting oversight board is virtually…

Read the full story

Posted in: Press ReleasesComments (1)

See more articles in the archive